HomeCompare › How to Choose EOT Claim Software
Compare · the whole category, including us

How to choose EOT claim software without buying the wrong kind.

Six products call themselves delay or EOT tools. They do very different jobs. This page sorts them by what they actually produce, so you can pick by need rather than by whoever answered your LinkedIn message first.

6
Products compared, described from their own public websites
3
Distinct jobs: notice tracking, schedule analysis, and claim drafting
Aug 2026
When competitor descriptions and prices were last verified. Re-check before buying.
FIRST QUESTION

Which job do you actually need done?

Before comparing features, decide which of three problems you are buying for. Most disappointment in this category comes from buying a register when you needed a draft, or a scheduling analyser when you needed a notice clock.

01

Notice tracking and registers

You need to know every deadline on every live project and prove notices were served. Tools built for owners and project managers do this well; they rarely draft anything.

02

Schedule delay analysis

You have a Primavera programme and need to quantify critical delay for a TIA or windows analysis. This is planning-engineer software and is only useful once a claim is already being fought.

03

Claim drafting from records

You need the narrative, the chronology, the evidence pack, and the notice letters, built from messy site records, structured for your contract family, and reviewed by an expert. This is the job DraftMyEOT does.

THE COMPARISON

What each product says it does, and what it costs

Descriptions and prices are taken from each product's public website as of August 2026 and paraphrased. All six companies are private and none publishes revenue or customer counts. Verify current terms directly before relying on them.

ProductWhat it doesPublished pricing (Aug 2026)Best fit
DraftMyEOTContract extraction with Particular Conditions diff, delay register with hindrance export, deadline engine with Gulf and India calendars, evidence locker (WhatsApp, diary OCR), notice letters, AI claim drafts, rebuttals, Arabic output; every draft expert-reviewedUSD 750 pilot draft; USD 6,000–12,000 per company per year; India per project from Rs 60,000; never per seatGulf and Indian contractors and boutique consultancies who need drafts, not just registers
Delay Claim BuilderSelf-serve AI tools for notices, claim narratives, rebuttals, P6 analysis, evidence gap checks; FIDIC, NEC4, JCT, AS 4000 awareness; Word exportUSD 299 per user per month, teams by contact; site showed a beta version tagUK and Australia teams comfortable with a self-serve tool and per-seat licences
ClaimLogicPurpose-built delay analysis: import P6, insert delay events into the baseline, calculate critical path impact, generate TIA reportsGBP 49 to 179 per month by tier; 14-day trialPlanning engineers who need schedule analysis rather than claim drafting or evidence management
MasttProject controls platform with an EOT register template, deadline alerts, and timeline recalculationUSD 150 per project licence per month; enterprise from 10 licencesOwners and project managers running portfolios; registers and alerts, not narrative generation
OpteamAll-in-one construction platform: P6 upload, real-time progress tracking and delay analysisCredit packs from USD 499 to 7,999, valid one yearContractors wanting a monitoring platform where delay is one feature among many
WeBuildCreate and send EOT notices for client approval, track responses, update the completion date in a registerAUD 60 per internal user per month, free external collaboratorsLightweight notice workflow for small teams; no drafting, evidence, or analysis
THE REAL ALTERNATIVE

Most buyers are not choosing between these six

The incumbent in this category is not software. It is Excel, Primavera, Word, and a claims consultant engaged after the fight begins. Two more pages cover that comparison honestly.

A

Software vs consultant fees

Where a consultant earns their fee, where they do not, and why the sensible model arms your consultant rather than replacing them. Read the comparison →

B

vs Excel, Primavera, and Word

The toolchain every contracts team already runs, what it does well, and the four places it loses claims. Read the comparison →

QUESTIONS TO ASK ANY VENDOR

Including us

COMPARING TOOLS · FREQUENTLY ASKED

Asked in every first call

Why compare yourselves to competitors on your own site?
Because buyers do it anyway, and a category this new is easier to buy from when someone describes it plainly. If a schedule analyser is what you need, ClaimLogic's description above will tell you so.
Are the competitor prices accurate?
They are what each site published in August 2026, paraphrased. Pricing pages change without notice. Confirm directly before deciding.
Do you integrate with Primavera P6?
Not yet. Time impact currently uses dates and durations you enter, and programme extracts can be attached as evidence. If P6 analysis is your primary need today, ClaimLogic or Opteam are built for it.
CERTIFICATIONS OF CONDUCT

Why you can put your name near it

Draft for expert review

DraftMyEOT is not a law firm and never claims to be. Every output is a draft, built to be reviewed and signed by your contracts lead or consultant.

Nothing invented, ever

No dates, events, or clause numbers appear that you did not supply. Every paragraph shows the evidence reference it was built from.

Your data, walled off

Each company's workspace is isolated, documents sit in private storage, and consultants see only the project they were invited to.

Judge the output, not the brochure

Send a contract, your delay events, and whatever records exist, tidy or not. A structured draft comes back in 48 hours. Not useful? Keep it, owe nothing.

Project
Your delayed project, any stage
Deliverable
EOT claim draft · notice status check · evidence gap list · annexure pack
Rev / Status
REV A · DRAFT FOR EXPERT REVIEW
Issued within
48 hours

Sources

  1. Delay Claim Builder public website, as reviewed August 2026
  2. ClaimLogic public website, as reviewed August 2026
  3. Mastt public website, as reviewed August 2026
  4. Opteam public website, as reviewed August 2026
  5. WeBuild public website, as reviewed August 2026