HomeBlog › India
India

Why Indian infrastructure claims reach arbitration years late (and how to prevent it)

Contractor claims against NHAI worth Rs 88,100 crore over five years, roughly 36 percent of value awarded on settled cases, and a system that only starts documenting when the fight is already formal.

The Standing Committee on Transport, as reported by Deccan Herald, put contractor claims raised in arbitration against NHAI over a recent five-year window at about Rs 88,100 crore, with roughly 36 percent of the claimed value awarded on the cases actually settled. The gap between claimed and awarded is not mainly a story about weak entitlement. It is a story about when the documentation starts.

Rs 88,100 Cr
Contractor claims in NHAI arbitration over five years, per the Standing Committee
~36%
Share of claimed value awarded on settled cases
Rs 10 Cr
Threshold above which a January 2026 circular moves disputes away from arbitration

The timeline that produces late claims

MONTH 1

Hindrance begins

Land not handed over, drawings pending, utility shifting stalled. The site knows. The register may or may not be started.

MONTH 2

Protective letter, maybe

A letter goes to the Authority Engineer, often generic, often not cross-referenced to a register entry.

MONTH 6

Slippage visible

Management asks for claim status. The register is reconstructed from site diaries and memory.

YEAR 1

EOT application

Built in-house by the planning team, at night, from a previous package's template.

YEAR 2

Determination and rejection

The AE grants a fraction or rejects. Conciliation begins. The contractor engages a consultant for the first time.

YEAR 3 TO 5

Arbitration

The tribunal weighs a reconstructed contractor record against an Authority record kept contemporaneously. The award follows the record.

Why it happens

The award follows the record, and the record is written in the first weeks, not the last.Why the fix is upstream of the dispute

How to prevent it

  1. Start the register on the first hindrance and log within the week.
  2. Number every protective letter and cross-reference it to a register entry; follow up on continuing hindrances.
  3. Make AE countersignature a monthly routine and record refusals.
  4. Keep the programme updates submitted and archived so time impact analysis is possible without reconstruction.
  5. Bring expert review forward: a reviewed draft application at month three costs a fraction of expert fees at year three and shapes the record while it can still be improved.

The forum is changing. The evidence is not.

The January 2026 MoRTH circular discussed by Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas moves NHAI disputes above Rs 10 crore away from arbitration toward other routes. Whatever body decides a claim, it decides it on the record. A contractor with a countersigned, cross-referenced, contemporaneous register is in the same strong position in any forum.

What this means in practice

  • The claim is decided in months one to six, not in years three to five.
  • Cross-reference letters and register entries from the first hindrance.
  • Bring expert review forward to the application stage.
  • Prepare for whichever forum by preparing the record.

DraftMyEOT exists so the register, the letters, the evidence, and a reviewed draft exist by month three, not year three.

Start a 48-hour draft →

This article is general information about how these contract mechanisms typically work. It is not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for review of your specific contract by a qualified professional.